On Friday, Sasha Perigo published on-line a prolonged and detailed rape allegation against Jon Jacobo, a prominent Mission politico and neighborhood activist.
And, whilst on line accusations of sexual misconduct are progressively common, the degree of element recounted within Perigo’s seven-page narrative is not widespread: It bundled screenshots of text messages, contemporaneous prepared conversations with regards to the alleged April assault, clinical records, a rape package, and a law enforcement report.
District Lawyer spokeswoman Rachel Marshall verified that the DA’s business office is investigating this case in cooperation with the police. Perigo reported that both equally a representative of the San Francisco Police Division and DA Chesa Boudin himself have contacted her due to the fact Friday to explore her selections.
Perigo, a housing activist who is properly acknowledged in area political circles, has mentioned she does not wish to press charges against the man she after considered a near buddy. But, with these allegations — and their fundamental evidence — now in the public sphere, that may perhaps be out of her hands.
“The decision on irrespective of whether to file fees is solely with the prosecutor — solely,” described retired Excellent Court docket Judge LaDoris Cordell. “Victims really don’t file prices. And victims can’t prevent prosecutors from filing expenses.”
“We prosecute violent crimes even without the need of witness cooperation when we can show the situation,” explained Marshall.
Several legal specialists contacted by Mission Nearby opined that the amount of depth provided within Perigo’s general public accusation by now met or exceeded the common of “probable cause” necessary for police to make an arrest. Probable cause “is not a pretty higher stress,” explained Laurie Levenson, a criminal regulation professor at Loyola Legislation University and previous federal prosecutor. “It doesn’t even suggest a lot more most likely than not. It’s just a solid suspicion.”
A San Francisco Law enforcement Division spokesperson stated that “the Exclusive Victims Device is knowledgeable of the social media posting and is hunting into the matter.”
When compared to the police, prosecutors, however, facial area a far larger burden: whether they can verify a scenario past a reasonable doubt. Which is a tough standard to satisfy devoid of the energetic participation of the accuser — in this circumstance, Perigo. But, lawful gurus ongoing, the evidence she has currently publicly offered mitigates her reticence to thrust for prison prices.
Perigo’s public statements “are of good aid to the prosecution,” Levenson mentioned, “and probably make it less difficult to prosecute, even if the sufferer does not would like to transfer forward.”
Underneath California proof law, Levenson observed, “You are ready to use prior statements. They never have to have been designed in suitable proceedings or below oath. She has finished a large amount of the prosecution’s operate.”
Considering the fact that Perigo submitted a police report, legally, a police officer’s testimony can even be utilised on her behalf, mentioned S.F. State prison justice lecturer and retired SFPD veteran Jim Dudley.
Whilst prosecuting crimes over the objections of the alleged victims is not par for the program, it’s rarely unheard of — specifically in the realm of domestic violence. These crimes ended up the moment categorized as a private or spouse and children make a difference, but they are now commonly dealt with as a crime against the public.

Prosecutions in these kinds of instances are not only meant to carry accountability to an abuser for his or her crimes from an personal victim, but to protect culture at massive.
Perigo instructed Mission Neighborhood that she would be “very upset if [the DA] had been to go forward without having my cooperation.” If, having said that, more accusers materialized, she would “absolutely cooperate.” In her unique Twitter put up, Perigo referred to as for accusers to make contact with her if they experienced knowledgeable everything identical with Jacobo.
Perigo provided various good reasons for not seeking to acquire even more legal action: She thinks the community is now very well informed of Jacobo’s alleged actions and she does not believe that incarceration can successfully rehabilitate offenders. At this position, she mentioned, the group and all those who like and care about Jacobo are dependable for holding him accountable.
Jacobo, who has not however returned calls from Mission Nearby, has stated that his memory of the function differs from Perigo’s, and he considered their encounter to be consensual.
Even though relations amongst the SFPD and DA are fraught — and the law enforcement could set Boudin on the location with a fast arrest of Jacobo, a noted police critic — lawful industry experts doubted this would occur to move.
Rather, they foresaw a extra thorough investigation that could, probably, uncover far more evidence from additional resources — and, if so, likely give Perigo time to change her intellect.
Retired judge Cordell laid out various opportunities, which includes Boudin most likely opting to convene a grand jury. Ultimately, she stated, the decision to shift ahead or not lies with the county prosecutor.
Complicating issues, having said that, Jacobo is a properly-recognized figure in San Francisco political circles. He was an lively volunteer in Boudin’s effective 2019 run for office. Marshall did not solution queries about no matter whether Boudin would recuse his office from a prospective prosecution, and rather request involvement from the point out lawyer basic.
Prior to Perigo’s Friday accusations, Jon Jacobo was a man on the ascent. The vice president of the Calle 24 Latino Cultural District, Jacobo experienced played a well known general public job in the Latino Job Force’s prosperous and lauded marketing campaign to assist, feed, check and vaccinate Mission denizens through the pandemic. He was a member of the Section of Constructing Inspection’s Setting up Inspection Committee — a purpose he has considering the fact that resigned from — and a touted likely aspirant to be the up coming District 9 supervisor.
Independent and apart from the validity of Perigo’s allegations, political observers were being stunned at the rapidity in which Jacobo’s prospective clients have been extinguished.
So have been authorized observers.

“We are dwelling in a social media globe now, where if you want to put your tale out there, you don’t have to go through the court technique to do it any longer,” claimed Cordell.
This was viewed as each an indictment of a lawful program that has even more traumatized alleged victims while coddling abusers, and an alarming new standard in which life can be designed or unmade with the simply click of a button, with minimal in the way of checks and balances.
Why make your case on social media in the courtroom of community feeling fairly than in a real courtroom? Because “the legal justice system does not perform,” sums up Hadar Aviram, a law professor at UC Hastings.
While the Sixth Amendment offers the accused the proper to an impartial trial, Aviram ongoing, trial by social media eliminates that. It also, even so, gets rid of alleged victims suffering the bruising experience of getting defamed during cross-examination and getting their morals and trustworthiness publicly questioned.
Even after the common authorized approach, numerous alleged offenders are by no means convicted owing to a absence of ample evidence. And, as Perigo has overtly stated, many victims do not sense a sense of healing after the incarceration of their alleged abusers.
“Our program even in the very best of times is complicated. It can choose a calendar year or two to go through the court approach. You have a victim waiting around, waiting, waiting,” explained Cathy Garcia, a previous law enforcement detective and DA investigator in San Diego. “Some people today will need their day in court,” when many others favor to have the general public choose the offender’s fate.
Perigo states her social media write-up was intended to give her some closure, equally by shifting community opinion of Jacobo and also simply just obtaining the knowledge off of her chest.
She ideas to look for redress from the California Victims Compensation Board, which can support offer healthcare and recoup shed wages for victims of numerous crimes. This, she claims, would not have been attainable without submitting a police report.
Substitute Accountability
Legal observers are uneasy with this new ordinary, which is viewed as a double-edged sword.
“One of the things the #MeToo movement is supplying is that an amazing sum of accountability or revenge — which it is, relies upon on your standpoint — occurs outside of the felony justice program, in the public sq.,” stated Aviram. “We are finding out to reckon that there are now other ways to place folks on the spot and expose what persons have finished outside the prison method.”
Even if there are sure advantages to adhering to a lawful course of action right after a crime is committed, in the circumstance of sexual assault, pursuing that recourse devoid of a victim’s consent could lead to even even further hurt to a victim. Even though Perigo has gained significantly general public guidance, she stated that the public scrutiny around just the past handful of times has been in many methods retraumatizing.
“Rape, in addition to other matters, is basically a denial of someone’s autonomy around their entire body,” claims David Ball, a legislation professor at Santa Clara College. “If this female is expressing, ‘I did not consent to the sexual exercise that took spot,’ relocating ahead with prosecution with no her consent appears, in some approaches, to replicate that harm.”
Make a just one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a annually donation
Decide on an sum
Or enter a custom quantity
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate annually